DIVISIONAL PERFORMANCE AND TRANSFER PRICING: COMPLETE GUIDE TO ROI, RESIDUAL INCOME, AND TRANSFER PRICING METHODS

Managing a large organisation is complex. As businesses grow, they often divide into separate divisions or departments. Each division has its own goals, responsibilities, and performance measures. But this creates a challenge. How do you evaluate performance fairly? And how do you price goods and services transferred between divisions?

This is where divisional performance measurement and transfer pricing come in. These are two of the most important topics in management accounting. Get them wrong, and you will have dysfunctional decision-making, demotivated managers, and suboptimal company performance. Get them right, and you unlock a powerful system for driving growth, accountability, and profitability. This guide breaks down everything: divisional performance measures like ROI and RI, the objectives of transfer pricing, methods for setting transfer prices, and practical applications with worked examples. Let us get into it.

The Pain Points: Why Businesses Struggle with Divisional Performance and Transfer Pricing

The Tension Between Divisional and Company Goals

One of the biggest challenges in divisionalised organisations is goal congruence. Divisional managers are evaluated on their division’s performance. They are motivated to maximise their own division’s profit. But what is good for a division may not be good for the company as a whole. This conflict is at the heart of many performance management problems.

For example, a buying division may reject an internal transfer because the price is too high. The decision makes sense for the division’s profit. But the company as a whole would benefit from the transfer because the selling division has spare capacity. This is dysfunctional decision-making. The transfer price has made divisional and company goals point in different directions. The buying division focuses on its own short-term profit, ignoring the broader company benefit of utilising spare capacity. This misalignment can lead to significant lost opportunities and reduced overall profitability.

The Short-Termism Problem with ROI and RI

Return on Investment (ROI) and Residual Income (RI) are common divisional performance measures. But they can encourage short-term thinking. A division manager might reject a profitable long-term investment because it would reduce the division’s current ROI.

Consider a division that invests N50 million in new machinery for a product launch. The investment increases capital employed. The product only generates revenue in the second half of the year. The division’s ROI and RI appear to deteriorate. A manager focused on short-term performance might reject the investment. But not investing could damage the division’s long-term competitiveness. This is one of the key disadvantages of ROI. The manager is penalised for making a decision that benefits the company in the long run. This creates a perverse incentive to prioritise short-term results over long-term value creation.

The Transfer Pricing Dilemma

Setting transfer prices is a delicate balancing act. The price must be fair to both divisions. It must motivate managers to act in the company’s best interest. It must allow for meaningful performance evaluation. And it must be simple to understand and administer.

But these objectives often conflict. A variable-cost transfer price may encourage the correct group decision. But it leaves the selling division reporting a loss after fixed costs. A market price may appear independent and fair. But it can make the buying division reject an internal transfer that would benefit the group. There is no perfect solution. Each approach has trade-offs that managers must carefully consider. The choice of transfer price has significant implications for motivation, performance evaluation, and overall company profitability.

The Challenge of Cost-Based Transfer Prices

Cost-based transfer prices are common in practice. But they have significant drawbacks. A transfer price at full cost gives the selling division no profit. The manager would prefer to sell externally. This is demotivating and inconsistent with a profit centre structure.

A transfer price at full cost plus a markup is better for motivation. But the markup is often arbitrary. It may not reflect market conditions. It can distort performance evaluation and divisional autonomy. The selling division may have an incentive to sell more externally if profits are higher. This may not be in the company’s best interests. The arbitrary nature of the markup can also create disputes between divisions. The buying division may feel it is being overcharged, while the selling division may feel it is being undercompensated. These disputes can damage relationships and hinder collaboration.

The Nigerian Context: Evolving Transfer Pricing Rules

In Nigeria, transfer pricing is a growing focus for tax authorities. The introduction of the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA) 2025 has significant implications for multinational enterprises. Key changes include expanded statute of limitations for audits and new penalty provisions.

The NTA also introduces rules aligning with the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax. Nigerian resident entities of MNE groups must pay taxes resulting in an Effective Tax Rate of at least 15%. This increases the stakes for transfer pricing compliance. Companies that fail to comply face significant penalties and reputational damage.

Tax professionals warn that the new rules may prolong transfer pricing audits. The extended statute of limitations allows older transactions to remain open to scrutiny for longer. This creates uncertainty for businesses. It also increases the importance of robust transfer pricing documentation. Companies must be prepared to defend their transfer pricing policies years after the transactions occurred.

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

A multinational company operating in Nigeria failed to maintain proper transfer pricing documentation. The FIRS audited the company and proposed a significant adjustment. The company faced additional taxes, interest, and penalties. The cost of non-compliance was substantial. The company’s reputation was also damaged. The lesson is clear: transfer pricing compliance is not optional. It is a business imperative.

Divisional Performance Measurement

What Is a Division?

A division is a distinct part of an organisation that has responsibility for its own revenues, costs, and sometimes investments. Divisions are often organised by geography, product line, or customer segment. They are managed as separate profit or investment centres.

In a divisionalised structure, each division has its own management team. The team is responsible for the division’s performance. This creates accountability and allows for more focused decision-making. But it also creates the need for performance measurement and transfer pricing. The division’s performance must be evaluated fairly to motivate managers and ensure goal congruence.

Responsibility Centres and the Controllability Principle

Responsibility centres are units within an organisation that are assigned specific responsibilities. There are four main types: cost centres, revenue centres, profit centres, and investment centres. Each type has different performance measures.

The controllability principle states that managers should only be evaluated on factors they can control. This is a fundamental principle of performance measurement. It ensures fairness and motivation. If a manager is evaluated on uncontrollable factors, they may become demotivated. They may also make dysfunctional decisions to protect their own performance.

However, in practice, the controllability principle is often violated. For example, branch managers may not have full control over allocated common costs. Yet these costs may still form part of their performance evaluation. This is a common pain point in divisional performance measurement. Managers are held accountable for costs they cannot influence. This is unfair and demotivating. It can also lead to dysfunctional behaviour, such as blaming others for poor performance.

Return on Investment (ROI)

ROI is one of the most widely used divisional performance measures. It is calculated as divisional profit divided by divisional capital employed. ROI shows the return generated on the assets invested in the division.

Advantages of ROI:

Easy to understand and calculate

Allows comparison between divisions of different sizes

Encourages efficient use of assets

Disadvantages of ROI:

Can encourage short-termism

May lead to rejection of profitable investments

Can be manipulated through accounting choices

The short-termism problem is significant. A division with a high ROI may reject a project with a lower ROI, even if the project is profitable for the company. This is a classic example of dysfunctional decision-making. The manager is focused on maintaining the division’s ROI, rather than maximising company value.

Residual Income (RI)

RI is an alternative to ROI. It is calculated as divisional profit minus a charge for capital employed. The charge is usually based on the company’s cost of capital.

Advantages of RI:

Encourages managers to accept projects that exceed the cost of capital

Reduces the short-termism problem

Aligns divisional and company goals

Disadvantages of RI:

More difficult to understand than ROI

Not easily comparable between divisions of different sizes

Depends on the accuracy of the cost of capital estimate

RI is generally considered a better measure than ROI for encouraging goal congruence. A manager will accept any project with a positive RI, as it increases the division’s profit. This aligns with the company’s objective of maximising shareholder value. However, RI is more complex to calculate and understand. It also depends on the accuracy of the cost of capital estimate.

Evaluating ROI and RI in Practice

The choice between ROI and RI depends on the circumstances. ROI is simpler and more widely understood. It is useful for comparing divisions. RI is better for encouraging long-term investment and goal congruence.

However, both measures have limitations. They are based on accounting numbers. They can be affected by accounting choices and asset valuation methods. They also focus on financial performance, ignoring non-financial factors like customer satisfaction and employee morale.

Some organisations use a balanced scorecard approach. This combines financial and non-financial measures. It provides a more holistic view of performance. The balanced scorecard includes perspectives like customer, internal processes, learning and growth, and financial. This approach recognises that financial performance is only one aspect of overall success.

Transfer Pricing: Objectives and Key Concepts

What Is Transfer Pricing?

Transfer pricing is the price charged for goods or services transferred between divisions of the same organisation. It is an internal price, not a market price. But it affects divisional profits and performance evaluation.

Transfer pricing is a critical tool in divisionalised organisations. It determines how profits are allocated between divisions. It affects the motivation of divisional managers. It influences the decisions they make. A well-designed transfer pricing system can improve goal congruence and overall company performance. A poorly designed system can create conflict and dysfunction.

Objectives of a Transfer Pricing Policy

A good transfer pricing policy should achieve several objectives:

Goal Congruence: The policy should encourage divisional managers to make decisions that are in the best interests of the company as a whole. This is the most important objective. If divisional and company goals are not aligned, the organisation will suffer. Managers will make decisions that benefit their division at the expense of the company.

Divisional Autonomy: Managers should have the freedom to negotiate transfer prices and make decisions for their divisions. This maintains motivation and accountability. But autonomy must be balanced with the need for goal congruence. Too much autonomy can lead to dysfunctional decision-making. Too little autonomy can demotivate managers.

Fair Performance Evaluation: The transfer price should allow each division to earn a fair return for its work. This ensures that performance evaluation is meaningful and motivating. If one division’s profit is distorted by an unfair transfer price, the evaluation is meaningless. The manager may be demotivated or rewarded unfairly.

Simplicity and Transparency: Managers should understand how the transfer price is calculated and why it is being used. A complex or opaque system will create confusion and resentment. Managers may not trust the system. They may make decisions based on incorrect assumptions.

Profit Maximisation: The transfer price should be set to maximise the company’s overall profits. This is the ultimate goal. The transfer price is a tool for achieving this. But profit maximisation must be balanced with other objectives.

The Conflict Between Objectives

These objectives often conflict. A transfer price that maximises company profit may reduce divisional autonomy. A transfer price that is simple may not be fair. A transfer price that is fair may not motivate managers.

For example, a variable-cost transfer price may encourage the correct group decision when the selling division has spare capacity. But it leaves the selling division reporting a loss after fixed costs. This is demotivating and unfair. It violates the objectives of motivation and fair performance evaluation.

A market-based transfer price may appear independent and fair. But it can make the buying division reject an internal transfer that would benefit the group. This violates the objective of profit maximisation.

There is no perfect transfer price. The best approach depends on the specific circumstances. Managers must understand the trade-offs and choose the approach that best fits their organisation.

Transfer Pricing Methods

Market-Based Transfer Prices

The ideal transfer price is based on the external market price. This is the price that would be charged between independent parties. It is objective and fair. It supports divisional autonomy.

Advantages:

Objective and fair

Supports divisional autonomy

Provides a clear benchmark for performance evaluation

Disadvantages:

External market may not exist for the product

Market may be imperfect (e.g., limited demand or supply)

May not reflect the company’s cost structure

Market-based prices are the best option when an external market exists. But in many cases, there is no external market. Or the market is imperfect. The company must then use a cost-based or negotiated transfer price.

Cost-Based Transfer Prices

Cost-based transfer prices are common when there is no external market. The price is based on the costs incurred by the selling division. There are several variations:

Variable Cost: The transfer price is set at the variable cost of production. This encourages the correct short-term decision when the selling division has spare capacity. But it leaves the selling division with no contribution to fixed costs or profit. This is demotivating.

Full Cost: The transfer price includes both variable and fixed costs. This allows the selling division to recover its costs. But the buying division may treat the allocated fixed cost as a relevant cost and reject a beneficial transfer. This can lead to dysfunctional decisions.

Full Cost Plus: The transfer price includes a profit margin. This improves motivation. But the markup is often arbitrary and may not reflect market conditions. It can distort performance evaluation.

Standard Cost: The transfer price is based on a predetermined standard cost. This keeps inefficiencies in the selling division. It supports responsibility accounting. But a poor standard will still distort results.

The Minimum and Maximum Transfer Price

The selling division will not sell below its minimum price. The buying division will not pay above its maximum price. The transfer price must fall within this range for the transfer to occur.

Seller’s Minimum Price:
The minimum price is the marginal cost of the transfer plus any opportunity cost. The opportunity cost is the contribution lost from the best alternative use of resources.

If the selling division has spare capacity, the opportunity cost is zero. The minimum price is just the variable cost. If the selling division is at full capacity, the minimum price must include the contribution forgone from external sales. This is the external market price adjusted for any costs saved by internal trading.

Buyer’s Maximum Price:
The maximum price is the best external alternative available to the buying division. This is usually the external market price, adjusted for any differences in quality, delivery, or risk.

Negotiated Transfer Prices

In some cases, the divisions negotiate the transfer price themselves. This supports divisional autonomy. It can lead to a price that is acceptable to both parties.

Advantages:

Supports divisional autonomy

Can reflect the specific circumstances of the transaction

Managers are more likely to accept a price they have negotiated

Disadvantages:

Can be time-consuming

Can lead to conflict between divisions

May not maximise company profit

Negotiated prices are common in practice. But they can create tension between divisions. The negotiation process can be lengthy and divisive. Head office may need to intervene to resolve disputes.

Transfer Pricing Methods Under the OECD Guidelines

The OECD has developed five recognised transfer pricing methods for establishing arm’s length prices between related parties.

Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method

The CUP method compares the price charged in a controlled transaction to the price charged in a comparable uncontrolled transaction. This requires a high degree of comparability between the products or services.

Best for: Commodity sales, financial instruments, and intra-group loans. The CUP method is preferred when reliable market data is available.

Cost Plus Method

The cost plus method calculates the transfer price by identifying the costs of the supplier and adding an appropriate markup. The markup should reflect what an independent party would earn for comparable functions.

Best for: Routine services, contract manufacturing, and situations where the service provider bears limited risk.

Resale Price Method (RPM)

The resale price method uses the price at which a product is resold to an independent party, minus an appropriate gross margin. It is used when the reseller does not add substantial value.

Best for: Distributors who do not add significant value to the goods.

Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)

The transactional net margin method compares the net profit margin in a controlled transaction to the net profit margin earned in comparable uncontrolled transactions. It is less affected by product differences than the CUP method.

Best for: When comparables for gross margins are hard to find. It is commonly used in practice.

Profit Split Method

The profit split method divides the combined profit from controlled transactions based on each party’s relative contribution. It is used when transactions are highly integrated.

Best for: Unique, high-value intangibles or highly integrated operations where both parties make unique contributions.

Transfer Pricing in Nigeria: Key Developments

The Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) 2025

The NTA 2025 introduces significant changes to transfer pricing in Nigeria. Key provisions include:

Expanded Definition of Nigerian Company: The NTA expands the definition to include companies whose central place of management or control is Nigeria. This may make foreign entities resident in Nigeria.

Deemed Profit Margins: The NTA permits the use of deemed profit margins (not less than 4% of income from Nigeria) for Nigerian permanent establishments and international companies with Significant Economic Presence.

Interest Deductibility Restriction: Interest deduction on related-party loans is restricted to 30% of EBITDA.

Extended Statute of Limitations: The FIRS can continue audits and issue assessments even after the six-year limit has expired, provided the audit started before the deadline.

Effective Tax Rate Requirement: Nigerian resident entities of MNE groups must pay taxes resulting in an Effective Tax Rate of at least 15%, aligning with OECD’s Pillar Two.

Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA) 2025

The NTAA 2025 introduces provisions that may prolong transfer pricing audits. These include:

Extended Statute of Limitations: The new law allows older transactions to remain open to scrutiny for longer. This increases uncertainty for taxpayers.

New Penalty and Interest Provisions: Penalties and interest tied to transfer pricing adjustments may accumulate over long periods before taxpayers become aware of disputes.

Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) in Nigeria

The FIRS issued guidelines on Advance Pricing Agreements in 2025. APAs provide tax certainty for multinational enterprises.

Key Features:

Eligibility: Taxpayers with taxable presence in Nigeria and transactions meeting minimum thresholds

Threshold: USD 10 million for a single transaction or USD 50 million for a group of transactions

Cost: Non-refundable application fee of USD 20,000 for a new APA

Timeframe: FIRS aims to conclude unilateral APAs within 24 months

Term: Maximum of 3 years

Renewal: Possible for a maximum of 3 years

Worked Examples

Example 1: Calculating ROI and RI

Scenario:
A division has the following financial data:

Divisional profit: N2,000,000

Capital employed: N10,000,000

Cost of capital: 12%

Step 1: Calculate ROI
ROI = Divisional Profit ÷ Capital Employed
ROI = N2,000,000 ÷ N10,000,000 = 20%

Step 2: Calculate RI
RI = Divisional Profit − (Capital Employed × Cost of Capital)
RI = N2,000,000 − (N10,000,000 × 12%)
RI = N2,000,000 − N1,200,000 = N800,000

Interpretation: The division earns a 20% return on its assets, which is above the 12% cost of capital. It has a positive RI of N800,000.

Example 2: The Short-Termism Problem

Scenario:
A division currently has ROI of 25%. It is considering a new project that would generate a 15% return. The company’s cost of capital is 10%.

Step 1: Evaluate the Project
The project’s return of 15% is above the cost of capital (10%). It would be profitable for the company.

Step 2: Consider ROI Impact
The project would reduce the division’s ROI from 25% to perhaps 22%. The manager may reject the project to protect their ROI.

Step 3: Consider RI Impact
The project would generate positive RI. The manager would accept the project if evaluated on RI.

Decision: RI is better for encouraging goal congruence.

Example 3: Minimum and Maximum Transfer Price

Scenario:
Division A produces a component. It has spare capacity. Variable cost is N200 per unit. It can sell externally for N300 per unit. Division B needs the component. It can buy externally for N280 per unit.

Step 1: Seller’s Minimum Price
Minimum Price = Variable Cost + Opportunity Cost
Opportunity Cost = Contribution lost from external sales
Since the division has spare capacity, opportunity cost = 0
Minimum Price = N200

Step 2: Buyer’s Maximum Price
Maximum Price = Best External Alternative = N280

Step 3: Negotiation Range
The transfer price must be between N200 and N280 for the transfer to occur.

Interpretation: The divisions can negotiate a price within this range. A price of N240 would be fair to both parties and benefit the company.

Example 4: Transfer Pricing Methods

Scenario:
A multinational company has a subsidiary in Nigeria that manufactures components. The components are sold to a related company in the UK. The UK company sells the finished products to third parties.

Step 1: Identify the Best Method
The company should use the Resale Price Method (RPM) if the UK company is a distributor that does not add significant value. The transfer price is the final selling price minus an appropriate gross margin.

Step 2: Apply the Method
If the final selling price is £100 and the appropriate gross margin is 30%, the transfer price is £70.

Step 3: Document the Analysis
The company must maintain documentation showing how the transfer price was determined and why the method was chosen.

How Qeeva Advisory Helps You Navigate Divisional Performance and Transfer Pricing

We understand that divisional performance and transfer pricing can be complex. Many businesses struggle with goal congruence, performance measurement, and compliance. Our professionals specialise in management accounting, tax advisory, and transfer pricing.

Our Advisory Services Nigeria help you design divisional performance measurement systems that drive goal congruence. We help you choose the right performance measures and set fair transfer prices.

Our Tax Strategies and Planning services help you navigate transfer pricing compliance under the NTA 2025 and NTAA 2025. We help you prepare documentation and manage audit risk.

Our Regulatory Compliance services ensure your business meets all filing requirements and stays in good standing with the FIRS.

Our Risk Management services help you identify and manage risks associated with transfer pricing audits and disputes.

And because divisional performance is about people, our Training & Mentoring Services help you develop the skills of your managers and employees.

Our Service Methodology

We do not do generic. We do thorough, transparent, and actionable.

Step 1: Performance Measurement Assessment
We assess your current divisional performance measurement systems and transfer pricing policies. We identify gaps, risks, and opportunities for improvement. This step draws on our Advisory Services Nigeria expertise.

Step 2: Transfer Pricing Policy Design
We help you design a transfer pricing policy that achieves goal congruence, supports divisional autonomy, and ensures fair performance evaluation. We consider market-based, cost-based, and negotiated approaches.

Step 3: Transfer Pricing Documentation
We help you prepare transfer pricing documentation that complies with the NTA 2025 and OECD guidelines. We ensure your documentation is robust and defensible.

Step 4: Tax Compliance and Advisory
We help you navigate transfer pricing compliance under the new tax laws. We provide advice on APAs, audit defence, and dispute resolution.

Step 5: Ongoing Monitoring and Support
Transfer pricing and performance measurement are not one-time exercises. We help you monitor changes in the law, update your policies, and stay current with best practices. We provide ongoing support through our Advisory Services Nigeria , Tax Strategies and Planning , and Risk Management services.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between divisional performance and transfer pricing?
A: Divisional performance is about measuring how well a division is doing. Transfer pricing is about setting the price for goods or services transferred between divisions. They are closely linked because transfer prices affect divisional profits and performance measures.

Q: What is the controllability principle?
A: The controllability principle states that managers should only be evaluated on factors they can control. This ensures fairness and motivation.

Q: What are the main divisional performance measures?
A: The main measures are Return on Investment (ROI) and Residual Income (RI). Both have advantages and disadvantages.

Q: What is dysfunctional decision-making?
A: Dysfunctional decision-making is when a manager makes a decision that is good for their division but bad for the company as a whole. This often happens because of transfer pricing.

Q: What are the objectives of a transfer pricing policy?
A: The main objectives are goal congruence, divisional autonomy, fair performance evaluation, simplicity, and profit maximisation.

Q: What is the minimum transfer price?
A: The minimum transfer price is the marginal cost of the transfer plus any opportunity cost. The selling division will not sell below this price.

Q: What are the OECD transfer pricing methods?
A: The OECD has five methods: CUP, Cost Plus, Resale Price, TNMM, and Profit Split. The most appropriate method depends on the circumstances.

Q: What is an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)?
A: An APA is an agreement between a taxpayer and the tax authority on an appropriate transfer pricing methodology for a set of transactions over a fixed period.

Q: How can Qeeva Advisory help with transfer pricing?
A: We provide performance measurement assessment, transfer pricing policy design, documentation, tax compliance, and ongoing monitoring to help businesses navigate divisional performance and transfer pricing.

The Bottom Line

Divisional performance and transfer pricing are essential tools for managing large organisations. They help evaluate performance, motivate managers, and ensure goal congruence. But they are also complex. The choice of performance measure and transfer pricing method has significant implications.

ROI and RI are the main performance measures. Each has advantages and disadvantages. ROI is simple and comparable. RI is better for encouraging long-term investment. The choice depends on the circumstances.

Transfer pricing is a delicate balancing act. The objectives of goal congruence, divisional autonomy, and fair performance evaluation often conflict. Market-based prices are ideal but not always available. Cost-based prices are common but have drawbacks. Negotiated prices support autonomy but can be time-consuming.

In Nigeria, transfer pricing is a growing focus for tax authorities. The NTA 2025 and NTAA 2025 have introduced significant changes. Multinational enterprises must be prepared for more rigorous enforcement and audits.

Your job is to be prepared. Understand the objectives of divisional performance and transfer pricing. Choose the right performance measures. Set fair transfer prices. Maintain robust documentation. Seek professional guidance.

With the right approach and the right partner, you can turn divisional performance and transfer pricing from a compliance burden into a strategic advantage.

The choice is yours.

Suggested Reading from Our Blog

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Finance – Explore how AI is transforming financial services, from fraud detection and credit risk assessment to personalised financial advice and regulatory compliance.

Big Data Analytics in Management Accounting – Understand how big data analytics is revolutionising management accounting, enabling real-time financial monitoring, predictive analytics, and enhanced decision-making.

Basic Ethical Issues in Taxation Under Nigeria’s New Tax Laws – Examine the ethical challenges arising from Nigeria’s 2025 tax reforms, including procedural integrity, coercive enforcement powers, and fairness.

Basis for Taxation of Enterprises in Free Trade Zones in Nigeria – Understand the legal basis for taxing Free Trade Zone enterprises under the NEPZA Act, OGFZA Act, and the NTA 2025 framework.

Assessment, Objections, Appeals, and Remittances in Nigerian Tax – Navigate the tax dispute resolution process under the NTAA 2025, including assessments, objections, appeals, and enforcement mechanisms.

Related Services

Our Advisory Services Nigeria are staffed by professionals specialising in management accounting, tax advisory, and transfer pricing.

Our Tax Strategies and Planning services help you navigate transfer pricing compliance under the new tax laws.

Our Regulatory Compliance services ensure your business meets all filing requirements and stays in good standing.

Our Risk Management services help you identify and manage risks associated with transfer pricing audits and disputes.

Our Training & Mentoring Services help you develop the skills of your managers and employees.

Let’s Talk About Your Divisional Performance and Transfer Pricing

Navigating divisional performance and transfer pricing can feel complex. At Qeeva Advisory, we understand the challenges businesses face in designing fair performance measures and setting appropriate transfer prices.

Whether you need help designing a divisional performance system, setting transfer prices, preparing transfer pricing documentation, or managing tax compliance, we are here to support you.

📞 Call us: (+234) 802 320 0801, (+234) 807 576 5799
📧 Email: info@qeeva.com
📍 Visit us: 5, Ishola Bello Close, Off Iyalla Street, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria

Contact us today to schedule a consultation. Let us help you navigate divisional performance and transfer pricing with confidence.

Your journey to better performance management starts with a conversation. Let’s talk.

Reference Links / Sources

ACCA Global – Divisional Performance Management – Technical Article

ACCA Transfer Pricing – OpenTuition

aCOWtancy – Transfer Pricing – Imperfect Market Notes

Andersen Nigeria – 2025 in Review: Transfer Pricing Developments in Nigeria

BusinessDay – Nigeria’s tax rules may prolong transfer pricing audits for multinationals

GOV.UK – HMRC International Manual – Cost Plus Case Study

Lexology – Nigeria’s Guidelines on Advance Pricing Agreements

Price Bailey – Transfer Pricing Methods – OECD Guidelines

REPTUNE – Choosing the Right Transfer Pricing Method: A Practical Guide

ScienceDirect – Divisional performance measurement in the retail financial service sector